From: | "Mohan, Ross" <RMohan(at)arbinet(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: How to improve db performance with $7K? |
Date: | 2005-04-20 16:17:50 |
Message-ID: | CC74E7E10A8A054798B6611BD1FEF4D307966B98@vamail01.thexchange.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
kewl.
Well, 8k request out of PG kernel might turn into an "X"Kb request at
disk/OS level, but duly noted.
Did you scan the code for this, or are you pulling this recollection from
the cognitive archives? :-)
-----Original Message-----
From: Jim C. Nasby [mailto:decibel(at)decibel(dot)org]
Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2005 8:12 PM
To: Mohan, Ross
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] How to improve db performance with $7K?
On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 06:41:37PM -0000, Mohan, Ross wrote:
> Don't you think "optimal stripe width" would be
> a good question to research the binaries for? I'd
> think that drives the answer, largely. (uh oh, pun alert)
>
> EG, oracle issues IO requests (this may have changed _just_
> recently) in 64KB chunks, regardless of what you ask for.
> So when I did my striping (many moons ago, when the Earth
> was young...) I did it in 128KB widths, and set the oracle
> "multiblock read count" according. For oracle, any stripe size
> under 64KB=stupid, anything much over 128K/258K=wasteful.
>
> I am eager to find out how PG handles all this.
AFAIK PostgreSQL requests data one database page at a time (normally 8k). Of course the OS might do something different.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Database Consultant decibel(at)decibel(dot)org
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828
Windows: "Where do you want to go today?"
Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?"
FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?"
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Anjan Dave | 2005-04-20 16:33:08 | Re: Opteron vs Xeon (Was: What to do with 6 disks?) |
Previous Message | Christian Sander Røsnes | 2005-04-20 16:14:12 | Re: Opteron vs Xeon (Was: What to do with 6 disks?) |