| From: | "Mohan, Ross" <RMohan(at)arbinet(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Fast request for version checking.... |
| Date: | 2005-05-28 15:21:29 |
| Message-ID: | CC74E7E10A8A054798B6611BD1FEF4D30625DB2E@vamail01.thexchange.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
I have 2.53, yes.
But, I am going to rebuild and re-AC this, so need
to build m4 (1.4.3) in order to get to 2.59 of AConf.
Any reasons to strongly advocate or avoid forcing
compiler into strict ANSI/C99 or ISO C mode? I had
to do that to get m4 to compile. I'd like to stay
on a single track (ANSI compliant or not) with all
builds.
An RTFM pointer to a doc would be more than ample,
if such explanation already exists!
Thanks!!
-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us]
Sent: Fri 27-May-05 8:35 PM
To: Mohan, Ross
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Fast request for version checking....
"Mohan, Ross" <RMohan(at)arbinet(dot)com> writes:
> if you go to the root of your postgresql distro
> and type
> ./configure --version
> what version of AutoConf was used?
For any reasonably recent PG release, it will be 2.53 if built from
source. Some RPM distributions may have re-autoconf'd though (I think
Red Hat is currently using 2.59, for instance).
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2005-05-28 20:15:54 | Re: Fast request for version checking.... |
| Previous Message | Kay-Uwe Genz | 2005-05-28 13:52:49 | Re: Using PG 8.0 with OpenSSL |