From: | "Mohan, Ross" <RMohan(at)arbinet(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PG performance comparison vs Oracle |
Date: | 2005-05-17 18:34:44 |
Message-ID: | CC74E7E10A8A054798B6611BD1FEF4D30625DAE0@vamail01.thexchange.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Lee,
Terse pointers:
1) Some posted already in list. Although, it may have been "performance".
This question might be better addressed there. YMMV.
2) Performance of _what_? Concurrent reads? Single user batch loads?
DW application? Multitable updates? "pure" OLTP? "pure" OLAP?
Finding out "Who is the winner?" requires that you first design a racecourse.
3) www.tpc.org (for ideas; no decent PG or MySQL benchmarks I could find there
4) Performance is measured against hw, sw budget dollars and also against user
perceptions. This would be part of the racecourse, IMHO.
5) As a "rule", at extremes of largeness, nothing beats oracle.
Hope These Help a bit,
Ross
-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-admin-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org [mailto:pgsql-admin-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Lee Wu
Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2005 1:25 PM
To: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: [ADMIN] PG performance comparison vs Oracle
Hi all,
Anyone has it or point to me the right direction?
Thanks,
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ing. Jhon Carrillo | 2005-05-18 13:27:45 | database A to database B |
Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2005-05-17 17:25:51 | Re: Cannot verify signature of win32 8.0.3 distribution. |