From: | "Guy Rouillier" <guyr(at)masergy(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PRIMARY KEY on a *group* of columns imply that each column is NOT NULL? |
Date: | 2005-04-26 20:22:40 |
Message-ID: | CC1CF380F4D70844B01D45982E671B239E87C4@mtxexch01.add0.masergy.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> If I define a primary key:
>
> name TEXT NOT NULL,
> address INET,
> PRIMARY KEY(name, address)
>
> the definition (seen by \d) becomes:
>
> name | text | not null
> address | inet | not null
>
> "address" is now not null, which I do not want. It seems unnecessary:
> I just want the tuple (name, address) to be unique, which seems
> possible even if some 'address' values are NULL.
>
> It does not appear to be documented in
>
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/7.4/interactive/ddl-constraints.html#AEN1
975.
> Is there a workaround?
Per the SQL Commands Reference, under CREATE TABLE:
"The primary key constraint specifies that a column or columns of a
table may contain only unique (non-duplicate), nonnull values.
Technically, PRIMARY KEY is merely a combination of UNIQUE and NOT NULL"
Primary key columns cannot contain null values.
--
Guy Rouillier
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Darcy Buskermolen | 2005-04-26 20:24:59 | Re: OpenRPT (was Re: [ANNOUNCE] == PostgreSQL Weekly |
Previous Message | Steve - DND | 2005-04-26 20:05:02 | plruby on Windows |