| From: | "Guy Rouillier" <guyr(at)masergy(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pl/pgsql oddity |
| Date: | 2004-12-16 19:12:20 |
| Message-ID: | CC1CF380F4D70844B01D45982E671B2348E4C0@mtxexch01.add0.masergy.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Michael Fuhr wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 16, 2004 at 12:27:53PM -0500, Geoffrey wrote:
>
>> I don't know of any other language that permits multiple spellings
>> for the same construct. I'd be concerned with starting such a
>> precedent.
>
> I'd be in favor of making it a bloody law that every bloody language
> use the same bloody spelling. I'm forever forgetting whether a
> particular language uses ELSE IF, ELSEIF, ELSIF, or ELIF. Grumble,
> grumble, grumble....
As a relative newbie to PostgreSQL (but an old-timer to programming
languages and other DMBSs) I would certainly vote for allowing elseif.
This is my first encounter of "else" without the terminating "e", and
that would not be a natural omission for me.
--
Guy Rouillier
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Frank D. Engel, Jr. | 2004-12-16 20:01:24 | Re: pl/pgsql oddity |
| Previous Message | Karl O. Pinc | 2004-12-16 18:48:59 | Re: Postgres not using shared memory |