From: | Marc Fournier <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | KONDO Mitsumasa <kondo(dot)mitsumasa(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Postgres General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Who is pgFoundery administrator? |
Date: | 2013-10-02 15:42:50 |
Message-ID: | CB329EC1-5CD8-4C9D-97CF-F211B62A2C3B@hub.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
direct_cp project approved, sorry for delay …
as to the the mailing list issue, where did you send it? can you resend it to me here?
On 2013-10-02, at 6:46 , Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 3:37 AM, KONDO Mitsumasa
> <kondo(dot)mitsumasa(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I want to submit new project in pgFoundery project.
>>
>> I submitted new project which is WAL archive copy tool with directIO method in
>> pgFoundery homepage 2 weeks ago, but it does not have approved and responded at
>> all:-(
>>
>> Who is pgFoundery administrator or board member now? I would like to send e-mail
>> them. At least, it does not have information and support page in pgFoundery homepage.
>
> I have not been able to get in contact with Marc either to help
> resolve a mailing list administration issue. Github is nice, but a
> lot of projects are still hosted on pgfoundry and it kind of sucks to
> be forced to move on this basis.
>
> merlin
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Rysdam | 2013-10-02 16:01:13 | Re: partitioning for speed, but query planner ignores |
Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2013-10-02 15:19:58 | Re: partitioning for speed, but query planner ignores |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2013-10-02 16:04:13 | Re: insert throw error when year field len > 4 for timestamptz datatype |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2013-10-02 15:08:21 | Re: logical changeset generation v6.1 |