From: | "lkcl (dot)" <luke(dot)leighton(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [feature] cached index to speed up specific queries on extremely large data sets |
Date: | 2014-04-11 12:53:06 |
Message-ID: | CAPweEDzsNiffe-7OP3M+XS7_4Op-8Y=tEi5rsr4XHgSh+pF3qA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
<hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com> wrote:
> On 04/11/2014 03:20 PM, lkcl . wrote:
>>
>> so i had an idea. there already exists the concept of indexes. there
>> already exists the concept of "cached queries". question: would it be
>> practical to*merge* those two concepts such that specific queries
>> could be*updated* as new records are added, such that when the query
>>
>> is called again it answers basically pretty much immediately? let us
>> assume that performance degradation on "update" (given that indexes
>> already exist and are required to be updated) is acceptable.
>
>
> I think you just described materialized views.
... well... dang :)
http://tech.jonathangardner.net/wiki/PostgreSQL/Materialized_Views
ok so definitely not the snapshot materialised views, but yes! the
eager materialised views, definitely.
> The built-in materialized
> views in PostgreSQL are not updated immediately as the tables are modified,
... but that would probably be enough.
> but it's entirely possible to roll your own using views and triggers. There
> are a few links on the PostgreSQL wiki, in the "Versions before 9.3"
> section: https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Materialized_Views.
awesome. uhhh, well that was easy *lol*. once i am paid, whom do i
send the payment to for the fast response and incredibly valuable
information? :) [this is a serious question!]
l.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2014-04-11 13:12:01 | Re: [feature] cached index to speed up specific queries on extremely large data sets |
Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2014-04-11 12:31:16 | Re: WIP patch (v2) for updatable security barrier views |