Great, given it does not apply to this patch, then all the other tests
passed and the change looks good.
Thank you,
Enrique
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 6:27 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Enrique Meneses <emmeneses(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > I was not sure what "Spec compliant means"... so I did not select as
> tested or passed. What should I do to validate that this change is "Spec
> compliant"?
>
> It's irrelevant to this patch, AFAICS. The SQL standard doesn't discuss
> indexes at all, much less legislate on which operator classes ought to
> exist for GIN indexes.
>
> regards, tom lane
>