From: | Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> |
Cc: | Dmitry Koval <d(dot)koval(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Add SPLIT PARTITION/MERGE PARTITIONS commands |
Date: | 2024-05-17 10:05:01 |
Message-ID: | CAPpHfdvz3S7SoRiaSk9C-Juy2EzHs6NC_c9uUR0i7bymKXkvuQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 5:49 PM Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, May 09, 2024 at 12:51:32AM +0300, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> > > > However, parent's table extended statistics already covers all its
> > > > children.
> > >
> > > => That's the wrong explanation. It's not that "stats on the parent
> > > table cover its children". It's that there are two types of stats:
> > > stats for the "table hierarchy" and stats for the individual table.
> > > That's true for single-column stats as well as for extended stats.
> > > In both cases, that's indicated by the inh flag in the code and in the
> > > catalog.
> > >
> > > The right explanation is that extended stats on partitioned tables are
> > > not similar to indexes. Indexes on parent table are nothing other than
> > > a mechanism to create indexes on the child tables. That's not true for
> > > stats.
> > >
> > > See also my prior messages
> > > ZiJW1g2nbQs9ekwK(at)pryzbyj2023
> > > Zi5Msg74C61DjJKW(at)pryzbyj2023
> >
> > Yes, I understand that parents pg_statistic entry with stainherit ==
> > true includes statistics for the children. I tried to express this by
> > word "covers". But you're right, this is the wrong explanation.
> >
> > Can I, please, ask you to revise the patch?
>
> I tried to make this clear but it'd be nice if someone (Tomas/Alvaro?)
> would check that this says what's wanted.
Thank you!
I've assembled the patches with the pending fixes.
0001 – The patch by Dmitry Koval for fixing detection of name
collision in SPLIT partition operation. Also, I found that name
collision detection doesn't work well for MERGE partitions. I've
added fix for that to this patch as well.
0002 -– Patch for skipping copy of extended statistics. I would
appreciate more feedback about wording, but I'd like to get a correct
behavior into the source tree sooner. If the docs and/or comments
need further improvements, we can fix that later.
I'm going to push both if no objections.
Links.
1. https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/147426d9-b793-4571-a5e5-7438affeeb5a%40postgrespro.ru
------
Regards,
Alexander Korotkov
Supabase
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v2-0001-Fix-the-name-collision-detection-in-MERGE-SPLIT-p.patch | application/octet-stream | 8.4 KB |
v2-0002-Don-t-copy-extended-statistics-during-MERGE-SPLIT.patch | application/octet-stream | 4.9 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alexander Korotkov | 2024-05-17 10:11:32 | Re: [PATCH] Improve amcheck to also check UNIQUE constraint in btree index. |
Previous Message | Richard Guo | 2024-05-17 09:41:04 | Re: Wrong results with grouping sets |