Re: SP-GiST for ranges based on 2d-mapping and quad-tree

From: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SP-GiST for ranges based on 2d-mapping and quad-tree
Date: 2012-08-18 14:10:50
Message-ID: CAPpHfdvs_01i-teiydrU6q1=V5S=rsCoOJ4Vv1kW4g4ArMae1w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Heikki Linnakangas <
heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:

> I committed the patch now, but left out the support for adjacent for now.
> Not because there was necessarily anything wrong with that, but because I
> have limited time for reviewing, and the rest of the patch looks ready for
> commit now. I reworded the comments quite a lot, you might want to
> proofread those to double-check that they're still correct. I'll take a
> look at the adjacent-support next, as a separate patch.
>

Thanks! There is a separate patch for adjacent. I've reworked adjacent
check in order to make it more clear.

------
With best regards,
Alexander Korotkov.

Attachment Content-Type Size
range_spgist_adjacent-0.1.patch application/octet-stream 14.4 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Janes 2012-08-18 19:01:49 Re: [PATCH] Docs: Make notes on sequences and rollback more obvious
Previous Message Craig Ringer 2012-08-18 11:36:19 Re: [PATCH] Docs: Make notes on sequences and rollback more obvious