From: | Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: unnesting multirange data types |
Date: | 2021-06-10 19:08:21 |
Message-ID: | CAPpHfdvZ00N=7JK6XMXGeETiFdDjoYHGbHOAuNeNLsaU4khsGQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 8:57 PM Jonathan S. Katz <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
> On 6/10/21 1:24 PM, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> > I agree that unnest(), cast to array and subscription are missing
> > points. Proper subscription support requires expanded object
> > handling. And that seems too late for v14.
>
> Agreed, the subscripting functionality is too late for v14. (Though
> perhaps someone ambitious could bridge that gap temporarily with the
> ability to add subscripting to types!).
>
> > But unnset() and cast to
> > array seems trivial. I've drafted unnest support (attached). I'm
> > going to add also cast to the array, tests, and docs within a day.
> > Stay tuned :)
>
> Awesome. I'll defer to others on the implementation. I'll try to test
> out the patch in a bit to see how it works.
Good!
> Are there any objections adding this as a v14 open item?
No objections, let's add it.
------
Regards,
Alexander Korotkov
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dean Gibson (DB Administrator) | 2021-06-10 19:29:05 | Re: AWS forcing PG upgrade from v9.6 a disaster |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2021-06-10 18:50:52 | Re: logical replication of truncate command with trigger causes Assert |