From: | Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-committers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pgsql: Fix arrays comparison in CompareOpclassOptions() |
Date: | 2024-11-12 01:45:10 |
Message-ID: | CAPpHfdvYYCv1+xTH2eKUnD7he3g5XuQU51gQjCC8XWngQCs1iA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers |
On Tue, Nov 12, 2024 at 3:10 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > On Tue, Nov 12, 2024 at 2:09 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> >> Umm ... you do realize we're still in release freeze?
>
> > Oh, I specially visited the wiki page, but misread the sentence on
> > when the release freeze stops. Obviously yes, tags aren't pushed,
> > that are just stamps. And that's not February 13th.
> > Sorry for this. Let me know if I can do something to fix this.
>
> Well, unless we need a re-wrap due to packager complaints, it
> won't make a difference. If we do need a re-wrap, we'll have
> to decide whether to temporarily revert this or to include it
> in the re-wrapped versions. The patch looks safe enough that
> probably including it would be okay ... but that was not the
> plan.
>
> I don't feel a need to make a decision about that unless it
> becomes necessary, though.
Thank you. I'm up to revert if needed.
------
Regards,
Alexander Korotkov
Supabase
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Langote | 2024-11-12 07:53:38 | Re: pgsql: Fix broken collate.icu.utf8 test in v12 branch. |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2024-11-12 01:10:50 | Re: pgsql: Fix arrays comparison in CompareOpclassOptions() |