Re: Failures with wal_consistency_checking and 13~

From: Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Subject: Re: Failures with wal_consistency_checking and 13~
Date: 2020-06-20 10:16:52
Message-ID: CAPpHfdvHSkUjBmEgXujHC4Vftp8xK_JrnwOtALqY2NZT9ZgvHw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 10:34 PM Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On 2020-Jun-15, Michael Paquier wrote:
>
> > I have begun my annual study of WAL consistency across replays, and
> > wal_consistency_checking = 'all' is pointing out at some issues with
> > at least VACUUM and SPGist:
> > FATAL: inconsistent page found, rel 1663/16385/22133, forknum 0,
> > blkno 15
> > CONTEXT: WAL redo at 0/739CEDE8 for SPGist/VACUUM_REDIRECT: newest
> > XID 4619
> >
> > It may be possible that there are other failures, I have just run
> > installcheck and this is the first failure I saw after replaying all
> > the generated WAL on a standby. Please note that I have also checked
> > 12, and installcheck passes.
>
> Umm. Alexander, do you an idea of what this is about?

I don't have idea yet, but I'll check this out

------
Regards,
Alexander Korotkov

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexander Korotkov 2020-06-20 10:55:33 Re: Operator class parameters and sgml docs
Previous Message Fabien COELHO 2020-06-20 07:08:06 Re: update substring pattern matching syntax