Re: Bug in nbtree optimization to skip > operator comparisons (or < comparisons in backwards scans)

From: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bug in nbtree optimization to skip > operator comparisons (or < comparisons in backwards scans)
Date: 2023-12-12 13:22:16
Message-ID: CAPpHfdv7mPZQ-7sny0Avni595=12f3w6AgSHJxPOY1bNqq=sig@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 6:16 PM Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> wrote:
> Will you be in Prague this week? If not this might have to wait.

Sorry, I wouldn't be in Prague this week. Due to my current
immigration status, I can't travel.
I wish you to have a lovely time in Prague. I'm OK to wait, review
once you can. I will probably provide a more polished version
meanwhile.

------
Regards,
Alexander Korotkov

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2023-12-12 13:28:51 Re: SLRU optimization - configurable buffer pool and partitioning the SLRU lock
Previous Message jian he 2023-12-12 13:04:29 Re: POC PATCH: copy from ... exceptions to: (was Re: VLDB Features)