Re: jsonpath versus NaN

From: Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Oleg Bartunov <obartunov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: jsonpath versus NaN
Date: 2020-06-18 16:36:02
Message-ID: CAPpHfdv3djxi8jNoAnbsGj6QANz0gUi+8iKyms_=Ai_-L7ZjpQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 7:34 PM Alexander Korotkov
<a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
> Thank you for your answer. I'm trying to understand your point.
> Standard claims that .double() method should behave the same way as
> CAST to double. However, standard references the standard behavior of
> CAST here, not behavior of your implementation of CAST.

Typo here: please read "our implementation of CAST" here.

> So, if we
> extend the functionality of standard CAST in our implementation, that
> doesn't automatically mean we should extend the .double() jsonpath
> method in the same way. Is it correct?

------
Alexander Korotkov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2020-06-18 16:43:57 Re: More tzdb fun: POSIXRULES is being deprecated upstream
Previous Message Tom Lane 2020-06-18 16:35:54 Re: jsonpath versus NaN