From: | Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Oleg Bartunov <obartunov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: jsonpath versus NaN |
Date: | 2020-06-18 16:36:02 |
Message-ID: | CAPpHfdv3djxi8jNoAnbsGj6QANz0gUi+8iKyms_=Ai_-L7ZjpQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 7:34 PM Alexander Korotkov
<a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
> Thank you for your answer. I'm trying to understand your point.
> Standard claims that .double() method should behave the same way as
> CAST to double. However, standard references the standard behavior of
> CAST here, not behavior of your implementation of CAST.
Typo here: please read "our implementation of CAST" here.
> So, if we
> extend the functionality of standard CAST in our implementation, that
> doesn't automatically mean we should extend the .double() jsonpath
> method in the same way. Is it correct?
------
Alexander Korotkov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2020-06-18 16:43:57 | Re: More tzdb fun: POSIXRULES is being deprecated upstream |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2020-06-18 16:35:54 | Re: jsonpath versus NaN |