Re: Some other things about contrib/bloom and generic_xlog.c

From: Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
To: Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Some other things about contrib/bloom and generic_xlog.c
Date: 2016-04-12 15:35:54
Message-ID: CAPpHfduigaVxE=hS_8YqqPPnOn5EWAB44kM8EZZeC1qcXGNwaQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 6:34 PM, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru> wrote:

> I agree with both of these ideas. Patch is attached.
>>
>
> Hmm, you accidentally forget to change flag type of GenericXLogRegister in
> contrib/bloom signature.

Fixed.

------
Alexander Korotkov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company

Attachment Content-Type Size
generic-xlog-register-2.patch application/octet-stream 11.5 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2016-04-12 15:42:46 Re: Some other things about contrib/bloom and generic_xlog.c
Previous Message Teodor Sigaev 2016-04-12 15:34:24 Re: Some other things about contrib/bloom and generic_xlog.c