From: | Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
---|---|
To: | Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: LWLock optimization for multicore Power machines |
Date: | 2017-02-21 12:35:09 |
Message-ID: | CAPpHfducY+zBBUam7zDc8ZHgjQZAsLAFzMEJ7W6pyDFtOSdXXw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 1:47 PM, Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de> wrote:
> Am Samstag, den 11.02.2017, 15:42 +0300 schrieb Alexander Korotkov:
> > I think it would make sense to run more kinds of tests. Could you
> > try set
> > of tests provided by Tomas Vondra?
> > If even we wouldn't see win some of the tests, it would be still
> > valuable
> > to see that there is no regression there.
>
> Sorry for the delay.
>
> But here are the results after having run Tomas' benchmarks scripts.
> The pgbench-ro benchmark shows a clear win of the lwlock-power-3 patch,
> also you see a slight advantage of this patch in the pgbench-rw graph.
> At least, i don't see any signifikant regression somewhere.
>
> The graphs are showing the average values over all five runs for each
> client count.
>
Thank you very much for testing, results look good.
I'll keep trying to access bigger Power machine where advantage of patch is
expected to be larger.
------
Alexander Korotkov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2017-02-21 12:51:47 | Re: Measuring replay lag |
Previous Message | Alexander Korotkov | 2017-02-21 12:22:23 | Re: Should we cacheline align PGXACT? |