Re: LWLock optimization for multicore Power machines

From: Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
To: Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: LWLock optimization for multicore Power machines
Date: 2017-02-21 12:35:09
Message-ID: CAPpHfducY+zBBUam7zDc8ZHgjQZAsLAFzMEJ7W6pyDFtOSdXXw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 1:47 PM, Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de> wrote:

> Am Samstag, den 11.02.2017, 15:42 +0300 schrieb Alexander Korotkov:
> > I think it would make sense to run more kinds of tests. Could you
> > try set
> > of tests provided by Tomas Vondra?
> > If even we wouldn't see win some of the tests, it would be still
> > valuable
> > to see that there is no regression there.
>
> Sorry for the delay.
>
> But here are the results after having run Tomas' benchmarks scripts.
> The pgbench-ro benchmark shows a clear win of the lwlock-power-3 patch,
> also you see a slight advantage of this patch in the pgbench-rw graph.
> At least, i don't see any signifikant regression somewhere.
>
> The graphs are showing the average values over all five runs for each
> client count.
>

Thank you very much for testing, results look good.
I'll keep trying to access bigger Power machine where advantage of patch is
expected to be larger.

------
Alexander Korotkov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2017-02-21 12:51:47 Re: Measuring replay lag
Previous Message Alexander Korotkov 2017-02-21 12:22:23 Re: Should we cacheline align PGXACT?