| From: | Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Aliaksandr Kalenik <akalenik(at)kontur(dot)io> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] nodeindexscan with reorder memory leak |
| Date: | 2022-02-09 23:12:37 |
| Message-ID: | CAPpHfduLxM-tbmb+FqfNQrbgaUuLS1uKMZyeFTTv78jPfpD+BA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 1:19 AM Aliaksandr Kalenik <akalenik(at)kontur(dot)io> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 7, 2022 at 11:20 PM Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > Regarding the memory leak, could you add a corresponding regression
> > test to the patch (probably similar to Tom's query upthread)?
>
> Yes, added similar to Tom's query but with polygons instead of circles.
I've rechecked that the now patched code branch is covered by
regression tests. I think the memory leak issue is independent of the
computational errors we've observed.
So, I'm going to push and backpatch this if no objections.
------
Regards,
Alexander Korotkov
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2022-02-09 23:14:26 | catalog access with reset GUCs during parallel worker startup |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2022-02-09 23:11:29 | Re: wrong fds used for refilenodes after pg_upgrade relfilenode changes |