From: | Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tender Wang <tndrwang(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Alexander Pyhalov <a(dot)pyhalov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Remove an unnecessary check on semijoin_target_ok() on postgres_fdw.c |
Date: | 2025-03-25 10:57:03 |
Message-ID: | CAPpHfduHWDS2PHzuwDcd2DdiB4KHAXT1iQzOdyuTYOjFpnHhVA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 3:39 AM Tender Wang <tndrwang(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Alexander Pyhalov <a(dot)pyhalov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> 于2024年11月29日周五 00:02写道:
>>
>> Tender Wang писал(а) 2024-10-09 10:26:
>> > Hi,
>> > When I debug FDW join pushdown codes, I found below codes in
>> > semijoin_target_ok():
>> > if (bms_is_member(var->varno, innerrel->relids) &&
>> >
>> > !bms_is_member(var->varno, outerrel->relids))
>> >
>> > As far as I know, if a var belongs to the innerrel of joinrel, it's
>> > not possible that it
>> > may belong to the outerrel. So if the bms_is_member(var->varno,
>> > innerrel->relids)
>> > returns TRUE, then !bms_is_member(var->varno, outerrel->relids) must
>> > be TRUE.
>> > If bms_is_member(var->varno, innerrel->relids) returns FALSE,
>> > !bms_is_member(var->varno, outerrel->relids) will not execute due to
>> > short circuit.
>> >
>> > So I think we can remove the "!bms_is_member(var->varno,
>> > outerrel->relids)" from if.
>> > Any thoughts?
>>
>> Hi.
>> Seems good to me.
>> --
>> Best regards,
>> Alexander Pyhalov,
>> Postgres Professional
>
>
> Thanks for looking at that.
Pushed. But I've decided to keep the redundant check as an assertion.
------
Regards,
Alexander Korotkov
Supabase
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Shubham Khanna | 2025-03-25 10:58:06 | Re: Enhance 'pg_createsubscriber' to retrieve databases automatically when no database is provided. |
Previous Message | Alexander Korotkov | 2025-03-25 10:55:50 | Re: Add semi-join pushdown to postgres_fdw |