From: | Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: WIP: Fast GiST index build |
Date: | 2011-07-26 19:34:13 |
Message-ID: | CAPpHfdu9DbRQ93ACxBaDNDwCyAJpstHRubTjjY5eCbYeYkM7bg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 9:24 PM, Heikki Linnakangas <
heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> That was a quite off-the-cuff remark, so I took the patch and culled out
> loaded-tree bookkeeping. A lot of other changes fell off from that, so it
> took me quite some time to get it working again, but here it is. This is a
> *lot* smaller patch, although that's partly explained by the fact that I
> left out some features: prefetching and the neighbor relocation code is
> gone.
>
> I'm pretty exhausted by this, so I just wanted to send this out without
> further analysis. Let me know if you have questions on the approach taken.
> I'm also not sure how this performs compared to your latest patch, I haven't
> done any performance testing. Feel free to use this as is, or as a source of
> inspiration :-).
I also was going to try to evade keeping loaded-tree hash. This might help
me a lot. Thanks.
------
With best regards,
Alexander Korotkov.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2011-07-26 19:34:31 | Re: sinval synchronization considered harmful |
Previous Message | Yeb Havinga | 2011-07-26 19:32:11 | Pull up aggregate sublink (was: Parameterized aggregate subquery (was: Pull up aggregate subquery)) |