From: | Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Zhihong Yu <zyu(at)yugabyte(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: unnesting multirange data types |
Date: | 2021-06-15 13:10:21 |
Message-ID: | CAPpHfdu-LSrfCb6rTpuYfMxpD2VDgB3cJO1QzS1GA77RTJGEfA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 4:14 PM Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 3:50 PM Jonathan S. Katz <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
> > On 6/13/21 5:18 PM, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> >
> > >> "Expands an array into a set of rows. The array's elements are read out
> > >> in storage order."
> > >>
> > >> If we tweaked the multirange "unnest" function, we could change it to:
> > >>
> > >> + <para>
> > >> + Expands a multirange into a set of rows.
> > >> + The ranges are read out in storage order (ascending).
> > >> + </para>
> > >>
> > >> to match what the array "unnest" function docs, or
> > >>
> > >> + <para>
> > >> + Expands a multirange into a set of rows that each
> > >> + contain an individual range.
> > >> + The ranges are read out in storage order (ascending).
> > >> + </para>
> > >>
> > >> to be a bit more specific. However, I think this is also bordering on
> > >> overengineering the text, given there has been a lack of feedback on the
> > >> "unnest" array function description being confusing.
> > >
> > > I think it's not necessarily to say about rows here. Our
> > > documentation already has already a number of examples, where we
> > > describe set of returned values without speaking about rows including:
> > > json_array_elements, json_array_elements_text, json_object_keys,
> > > pg_listening_channels, pg_tablespace_databases...
> >
> > I do agree -- my main point was that I don't think we need to change
> > anything. I proposed alternatives just to show some other ways of
> > looking at it. But as I mentioned, at this point I think it's
> > overengineering the text.
> >
> > If folks are good with the method + code, I think this is ready.
>
> Cool, thank you for the summary. I'll wait for two days since I've
> published the last revision of the patch [1] (comes tomorrow), and
> push it if no new issues arise.
Pushed! Thanks to thread participants for raising this topic and
review. I'll be around to resolve issues if any.
------
Regards,
Alexander Korotkov
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alexander Korotkov | 2021-06-15 13:10:52 | Re: doc issue missing type name "multirange" in chapter title |
Previous Message | Nat! | 2021-06-15 13:04:11 | Less compiler errors in pg_crc32c_sse42_choose.c |