From: | Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Collation-aware comparisons in GIN opclasses |
Date: | 2014-09-15 15:28:20 |
Message-ID: | CAPpHfdtxXMjyZxwND09ZLBBACVbWb5J9bLUf67CndR4VKFDgwg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hackers,
some GIN opclasses uses collation-aware comparisons while they don't need
to do especially collation-aware comparison. Examples are text[] and hstore
opclasses. Depending on collation this may make them a much slower.
See example.
# show lc_collate ;
lc_collate
─────────────
ru_RU.UTF-8
(1 row)
# create table test as (select array_agg(i::text) from
generate_series(1,1000000) i group by (i-1)/10);
SELECT 100000
# create index test_idx on test using gin(array_agg);
CREATE INDEX
Time: *26930,423 ms*
# create index test_idx2 on test using gin(array_agg collate "C");
CREATE INDEX
Time: *5143,682 ms*
Index creation with collation "ru_RU.UTF-8" is 5 times slower while
collation has absolutely no effect on index functionality.
However, we can just replace comparison function for those opclasses
because it would break binary compatibility for pg_upgrade. I see following
solution:
1. Rename such opclasses and make them not default.
2. Create new default opclasses with bitwise comparison functions.
3. Write recommendation to re-create indexes with default opclasses into
documentation.
------
With best regards,
Alexander Korotkov.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais | 2014-09-15 15:37:24 | Re: .ready files appearing on slaves |
Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2014-09-15 14:25:37 | Re: delta relations in AFTER triggers |