Re: fix old confusing JSON example

On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 11:00 AM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 02:28:38PM +0200, Erik Rijkers wrote:
> > So, that gives information on two operators, and then gives one
> > example query for each. Clearly, the second example was meant to
> > illustrate a where-clause with the @? operator.
> >
> > Small change to prevent great confusion (I'll admit it took me far
> > too long to understand this).
>
> Once one guesses the definition of the table to use with the sample
> data at disposal in the docs, it is easy to see that both queries
> should return the same result, but the second one misses the shot and
> is corrected as you say. So, applied.
>
> My apologies for the delay.

My apologies for missing this. And thank you for taking care!

------
Regards,
Alexander Korotkov