From: | Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
Cc: | Alexander Korotkov <akorotkov(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Maxim Orlov <orlovmg(at)gmail(dot)com>, Svetlana Derevyanko <s(dot)derevyanko(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
Subject: | Re: pgsql: reindexdb: Add the index-level REINDEX with multiple jobs |
Date: | 2025-03-08 10:49:35 |
Message-ID: | CAPpHfdteHycyc2WjXx06kseek3YO_Yaii158i3wOkwm82=HMyg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Mar 7, 2025 at 8:20 PM Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
>
> On 2024-Mar-25, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
>
> > reindexdb: Add the index-level REINDEX with multiple jobs
> >
> > Straight-forward index-level REINDEX is not supported with multiple jobs as
> > we cannot control the concurrent processing of multiple indexes depending on
> > the same relation. Instead, we dedicate the whole table to certain reindex
> > job. Thus, if indexes in the lists belong to different tables, that gives us
> > a fair level of parallelism.
>
> I tested this, because of a refactoring suggestion [1] and I find that
> it's rather completely broken.
The code was written with assumption that running
run_reindex_command() with async == true can schedule a number of
queries for a connection. But actually that's not true and everything
is broken.
------
Regards,
Alexander Korotkov
Supabase
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2025-03-08 16:11:11 | pgsql: Make parallel nbtree index scans use an LWLock. |
Previous Message | Alexander Korotkov | 2025-03-08 10:42:41 | Re: pgsql: reindexdb: Add the index-level REINDEX with multiple jobs |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alexander Korotkov | 2025-03-08 12:12:13 | Re: pg_atomic_compare_exchange_*() and memory barriers |
Previous Message | Alexander Korotkov | 2025-03-08 10:42:41 | Re: pgsql: reindexdb: Add the index-level REINDEX with multiple jobs |