Re: Improving spin-lock implementation on ARM.

From: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Krunal Bauskar <krunalbauskar(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Improving spin-lock implementation on ARM.
Date: 2020-11-27 09:07:26
Message-ID: CAPpHfdtcL_z5FKifugkZbqkEioS0iNdxMa2SeEhcRfg2DC_QxQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 11:55 AM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> Not planning to buy one here, anything I have read on that tells that
> it is worth a performance study.

Another interesting area for experiments is AWS graviton2 instances.
Specification says it supports arm v8.2, so it should have swpal/casa
instructions as well.

------
Regards,
Alexander Korotkov

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Drouvot, Bertrand 2020-11-27 09:07:40 Re: Add Information during standby recovery conflicts
Previous Message Fabien COELHO 2020-11-27 09:04:44 Re: Add table access method as an option to pgbench