From: | Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Zidenberg, Tsahi" <tsahee(at)amazon(dot)com> |
Cc: | Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, Krunal Bauskar <krunalbauskar(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Improving spin-lock implementation on ARM. |
Date: | 2020-12-01 17:05:16 |
Message-ID: | CAPpHfdtaEco_Y2keGqWdxWX8pMe=9dxD30_9nBnH+9EOBYnVkw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 7:57 PM Zidenberg, Tsahi <tsahee(at)amazon(dot)com> wrote:
> > On 01/12/2020, 16:59, "Alexander Korotkov" <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 1:10 PM Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > > FWIW, here is an earlier discussion on the same (also added the
> > > proposal author here) :
>
> Thanks for looping me in!
>
> > >
> > > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/099F69EE-51D3-4214-934A-1F28C0A1A7A7%40amazon.com
> >
> >
> > Thank you for pointing! I wonder why the effect of LSE on Graviton2
> > observed by Tsahi Zidenberg is so modest. It's probably because he
> > runs the tests with a low number of clients.
>
> There are multiple possible reasons why I saw a smaller effect of LSE, but I think an important one was that I
> used a 32-core instance rather than a 64-core one. The reason I did so, was that 32-cores gave me better
> absolute results than 64 cores, and I didn't want to feel like I could misguide anyone.
BTW, what number of clients did you use? I can't find it in your message.
------
Regards,
Alexander Korotkov
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jeff Davis | 2020-12-01 18:16:31 | Re: Minor documentation error regarding streaming replication protocol |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2020-12-01 16:49:03 | Re: Improving spin-lock implementation on ARM. |