From: | Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
Cc: | Pavel Borisov <pashkin(dot)elfe(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kartyshov Ivan <i(dot)kartyshov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] make async slave to wait for lsn to be replayed |
Date: | 2024-04-06 21:52:47 |
Message-ID: | CAPpHfdtS4RPw3XpNL2zbS+jipm9mx=4Nv6zvyEdR4fRPvb0wrw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, Alvaro!
Thank you for your care on this matter.
On Fri, Apr 5, 2024 at 9:15 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
> BTW I noticed that
> https://coverage.postgresql.org/src/backend/commands/waitlsn.c.gcov.html
> says that lsn_cmp is not covered by the tests. This probably indicates
> that the tests are a little too light, but I'm not sure how much extra
> effort we want to spend.
I'm aware of this. Ivan promised to send a patch to improve the test.
If he doesn't, I'll care about it.
> I'm still concerned that WaitLSNCleanup is only called in ProcKill.
> Does this mean that if a process throws an error while waiting, it'll
> not get cleaned up until it exits? Maybe this is not a big deal, but it
> seems odd.
I've added WaitLSNCleanup() to the AbortTransaction(). Just pushed
that together with the improvements upthread.
------
Regards,
Alexander Korotkov
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Sergey Prokhorenko | 2024-04-06 21:59:38 | Re: UUID v7 |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2024-04-06 21:44:39 | Cluster::restart dumping logs when stop fails |