Re: Incorrect behaviour when using a GiST index on points

From: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Incorrect behaviour when using a GiST index on points
Date: 2012-02-20 08:44:29
Message-ID: CAPpHfdsyZYU7fV-Yp8uWbrOnxXL954rUA3Z3VqjoP=DyoqJdzg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Alexander Korotkov
<aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>wrote:

> Described differences leads to incorrect behaviour of GiST index.
> The question is: what is correct way to fix it? Should on_pb also use FP*
> or consistent method should behave like on_pb?
>

Any comments on this? Current behaviour definitely indicates a bug, and I'm
ready to fix it. The only question: is this bug in on_pb or gist?

------
With best regards,
Alexander Korotkov.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexander Korotkov 2012-02-20 08:51:44 Re: Google Summer of Code? Call for mentors.
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2012-02-20 07:49:17 Re: Displaying accumulated autovacuum cost