| From: | Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | Kevin Hale Boyes <kcboyes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kartyshov Ivan <i(dot)kartyshov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi, alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org, pashkin(dot)elfe(at)gmail(dot)com, bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com, euler(at)eulerto(dot)com, thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com, peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org, amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com, dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com, smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] make async slave to wait for lsn to be replayed |
| Date: | 2024-08-06 08:18:05 |
| Message-ID: | CAPpHfdswvdD6+TyyuJquBNvZU3Qn7PSGMvG2VgUBtF1Qcz0LQA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Aug 6, 2024 at 8:36 AM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 06, 2024 at 05:17:10AM +0300, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> > The 0001 patch is intended to improve this situation. Actually, it's
> > not right to just put RecoveryInProgress() after
> > GetXLogReplayRecPtr(), because more wal could be replayed between
> > these calls. Instead we need to recheck GetXLogReplayRecPtr() after
> > getting negative result of RecoveryInProgress() because WAL replay
> > position couldn't get updated after.
> > 0002 patch comprises fix for the header comment of WaitLSNSetLatches() function
> > 0003 patch comprises tests for pg_wal_replay_wait() errors.
>
> Before adding more tests, could it be possible to stabilize what's in
> the tree? drongo has reported one failure with the recovery test
> 043_wal_replay_wait.pl introduced recently by 3c5db1d6b016:
> https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=drongo&dt=2024-08-05%2004%3A24%3A54
Thank you for pointing!
Surely, I'll fix this before.
------
Regards,
Alexander Korotkov
Supabase
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Rajesh Kokkonda | 2024-08-06 08:33:32 | Re: Memory growth observed with C++ application consuming libpq.dll on Windows |
| Previous Message | Richard Guo | 2024-08-06 08:17:12 | Re: Wrong results with grouping sets |