Re: pgsql: Fix more holes with SLRU code in need of int64 for segment numbe

From: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, pgsql-committers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgsql: Fix more holes with SLRU code in need of int64 for segment numbe
Date: 2024-08-14 21:26:16
Message-ID: CAPpHfdsv-s+qA_yAnVfQ6D+5_qN-ZbE5u1k-CO9a4qpAOBA1iA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers

On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 5:13 AM Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 1:30 AM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> > > On Aug 13, 2024, at 6:35, Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:.
> > >
> > > As pointed by Noah Misch [1], unlike the commit the patch [2] also
> > > changed segment-returning functions to return int64. Thus, in the
> > > patch output formats make much more sense, because they match the
> > > input data types. Michael, are you intended to push the remaining
> > > part of the patch [2]?
> >
> > Guess so. I could look at that next week, not before.
>
> OK. I made an attached patch from the missing parts.
> Do you mind if I push that? If yes, feel free to use it.

I mean, I'd like to push it if you don't object.
If you object and like to push it yourself, feel free to use this patch.

------
Regards,
Alexander Korotkov
Supabase

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2024-08-14 23:07:29 Re: pgsql: Fix more holes with SLRU code in need of int64 for segment numbe
Previous Message Nathan Bossart 2024-08-14 19:26:13 pgsql: Add a couple of recent commits to .git-blame-ignore-revs.