Re: clearing opfuncid vs. parallel query

On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 12:31 PM, YUriy Zhuravlev <
u(dot)zhuravlev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:

> On Thursday 22 October 2015 09:26:46 David Fetter wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 07:15:35PM +0300, YUriy Zhuravlev wrote:
> > > Hello.
> > > Currently using nodeToString and stringToNode you can not pass a
> > > full plan. In this regard, what is the plan to fix it? Or in the
> > > under task parallel query does not have such a problem?
> > >
> > > > This turns out not to be straightforward to code, because we don't
> > > > have a generic plan tree walker,
> > >
> > > I have an inner development. I am using python analyzing header
> > > files and generates a universal walker (parser, paths ,executer and
> > > etc trees), as well as the serializer and deserializer to jsonb.
> > > Maybe I should publish this code?
> >
> > Please do.
> Tom Lane and Robert Haas are very unhappy with a python. Is there any
> reason?
>

Requirement of python with pycparser as build dependency is a
serious cataclysm. For instance, how many buildfarms will survive it?
This is why Tom and Robert are looking for ways to evade it.

------
Alexander Korotkov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company