From: | Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
---|---|
To: | Sawada Masahiko <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Darafei Praliaskouski <me(at)komzpa(dot)net>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Yura Sokolov <y(dot)sokolov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Ideriha, Takeshi" <ideriha(dot)takeshi(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh(dot)2007(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] GUC for cleanup indexes threshold. |
Date: | 2018-06-26 12:42:08 |
Message-ID: | CAPpHfdsd5uduNTSyGOroo7b6ZEATUzF8VH1-L6KWQU46ZNa=Bg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 1:46 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 6:55 PM, Alexander Korotkov
> <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
> > So, I propose to just
> > increase maximum value for both GUC and reloption. See the attached
> > patch. It also changes calculations _bt_vacuum_needs_cleanup() for
> > better handling of large values (just some kind of overflow paranoia).
>
> The patch looks good to me.
Pushed, thanks!
------
Alexander Korotkov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2018-06-26 12:48:21 | Re: Thinko/typo in ExecSimpleRelationInsert |
Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2018-06-26 12:23:02 | Re: Concurrency bug in UPDATE of partition-key |