| From: | Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Kartyshov Ivan <i(dot)kartyshov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
| Cc: | Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com, smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] make async slave to wait for lsn to be replayed |
| Date: | 2024-03-28 00:24:23 |
| Message-ID: | CAPpHfdsQNqQoFN_OosMUkZWLE-s=or=t+XVEHF5AGuMbdBMpew@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 4:06 PM Kartyshov Ivan
<i(dot)kartyshov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
> Thank you for your interest to the patch.
> I understand you questions, but I fully support Alexander Korotkov idea
> to commit the minimal required functionality. And then keep working on
> other improvements.
I did further improvements in the patch.
Notably, I decided to rename the procedure to
pg_wait_for_wal_replay_lsn(). This makes the name look consistent
with other WAL-related functions. Also it clearly states that we're
waiting for lsn to be replayed (not received, written or flushed).
Also, I did implements in the docs, commit message and some minor code fixes.
I'm continuing to look at this patch.
------
Regards,
Alexander Korotkov
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David G. Johnston | 2024-03-28 00:43:06 | Re: Possibility to disable `ALTER SYSTEM` |
| Previous Message | Robert Treat | 2024-03-28 00:24:04 | Re: DOCS: add helpful partitioning links |