| From: | Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
| Cc: | Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, Anastasia Lubennikova <a(dot)lubennikova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Alexander Kuzmenkov <a(dot)kuzmenkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
| Subject: | Re: WIP: Covering + unique indexes. |
| Date: | 2018-04-06 18:08:37 |
| Message-ID: | CAPpHfdsORjuUoEbAi-maApOXsyQNrfy9SyZuzDbOMic3uT-CcQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 8:42 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 10:33 AM, Alexander Korotkov
> <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
> > Thinking about that again, I found that we should relax our requirements
> to
> > "minus infinity" items, because pg_upgraded indexes doesn't have any
> > special bits set for those items.
> >
> > What do you think about applying following patch on the top of v14?
>
> It's clearly necessary. Looks fine to me.
>
OK, incorporated into v15. I've also added sentence about pg_upgrade
to the commit message.
------
Alexander Korotkov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| 0001-Covering-v15.patch | application/octet-stream | 206.4 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2018-04-06 18:13:42 | Re: Online enabling of checksums |
| Previous Message | Tomas Vondra | 2018-04-06 17:59:17 | Re: Online enabling of checksums |