From: | Jaroslav Urik <jarda(dot)urik(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: BUG #14949: array_append() - performance issues (in update) |
Date: | 2017-12-07 13:36:15 |
Message-ID: | CAPouvG5N9UsZOo5x0XyuSWmBJ9cZDmAL=JXpUvLofoF0iw9Cng@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Hi,
Thanks for quick response.
Is it possible that there might be something wrong with the table when it
was migrated from 9.6.6 -> 10.1 via pg_dump/restore? I have examined it
visually and the data seemed fine..
I will try to provide (not) working example on monday (currently travelling
without stable internet connection).
Regards,
Jaroslav Urik
On Wed, Dec 6, 2017, 17:40 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> jarda(dot)urik(at)gmail(dot)com writes:
> > I am having (time) issues with UPDATE of Array of INTEGERs:
>
> > Update eg:
> > UPDATE id_mng.id_pair SET segment = array_append(segment,7) WHERE
> > project_guid = '...' AND id_p IN ( SELECT... )
>
> Hm. In my hands, an array_append update like that doesn't seem to be
> any slower in v10 than prior versions. I tried both narrow and wide
> initial array values, like this:
>
> drop table if exists id_pair;
> create table id_pair(segment int[]);
>
> insert into id_pair select array[i,i+1] from generate_series(1,1000000) i;
>
> \timing on
> update id_pair set segment = array_append(segment,7);
> \timing off
>
> truncate id_pair;
> insert into id_pair select array_agg(i) from generate_series(1,1000) i;
> insert into id_pair select * from id_pair;
> insert into id_pair select * from id_pair;
> insert into id_pair select * from id_pair;
> insert into id_pair select * from id_pair;
> insert into id_pair select * from id_pair;
> insert into id_pair select * from id_pair;
> insert into id_pair select * from id_pair;
> insert into id_pair select * from id_pair;
> insert into id_pair select * from id_pair;
> insert into id_pair select * from id_pair;
> insert into id_pair select * from id_pair;
> insert into id_pair select * from id_pair;
> insert into id_pair select * from id_pair;
> insert into id_pair select * from id_pair;
> insert into id_pair select * from id_pair;
>
> \timing on
> update id_pair set segment = array_append(segment,7);
> \timing off
>
> For me, each of these updates runs in 5 to 6 seconds in any supported
> PG version.
>
> Can you provide a self-contained test case that shows what you're
> talking about?
>
> regards, tom lane
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alexander Korotkov | 2017-12-07 13:38:59 | Re: Fwd: [BUGS] pg_trgm word_similarity inconsistencies or bug |
Previous Message | steven.winfield | 2017-12-07 11:29:30 | BUG #14952: COPY fails to fill in IDENTITY column default value |