From: | Nikolas Everett <nik9000(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | James Freeman <james(at)quru(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL on Power Linux |
Date: | 2013-09-26 16:29:59 |
Message-ID: | CAPmjWd2kJe3LPvL=B9V3f5RGOF-xdE_V+fpY0b_k-qa2g_a_dA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 12:25 PM, James Freeman <james(at)quru(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Hi Nik,
>
> I don't disagree with your points on price of the Power platform or lack
> of wider adoption - however it's really kind of chicken and egg - we're
> only going to get wider adoption if everything falls into line. Opinion is
> sure to differ on what it would require but for me I would suspect you
> would need increased visibility that says "Postgres on Power can beat
> technology x hands down" - that's my bit as I don't think the wider world
> is aware of Power.
>
Well, five years ago Power on Linux beat x86 hands down for us. It became
a problem later but only due to lack of wider adoption and
price/interoperability.
> Regarding price and adoption - this is definitely the other big issue. I
> can't predict how this will go but the OpenPOWER consortium may go some way
> to lower pricing and wider adoption - I believe they have motherboard make
> Tyan engaged and whilst there is no physical product to show for it yet
> perhaps this could lead to white box Power solutions which would drive the
> cost down and hence adoption up. It would also pave the way (potentially)
> for competitors to IBM in the hardware space so buyers would no longer be
> single-sourced for their servers.
>
Cool!
Nik
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2013-09-26 17:20:27 | Re: PostgreSQL on Power Linux |
Previous Message | James Freeman | 2013-09-26 16:25:01 | Re: PostgreSQL on Power Linux |