From: | Nikolas Everett <nik9000(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alan Hodgson <ahodgson(at)simkin(dot)ca> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: 9.1 to 9.2 requires a dump/reload? |
Date: | 2012-10-23 13:41:20 |
Message-ID: | CAPmjWd1TQw9PNSUVj3+K64es-wDc=R+0Rvsr-cBmb13OhZHU6w@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 6:17 PM, Alan Hodgson <ahodgson(at)simkin(dot)ca> wrote:
> On Monday, October 22, 2012 05:55:07 PM Nikolas Everett wrote:
> > I see that pg_upgrade is an option. Having never used how long should I
> > expect pg_upgrade to take? Obviously we'll measure it in our
> environment,
> > but it'd be nice to have a ballpark figure.
>
> pg_upgrade using hard links should only take a minute or 2. You'll also
> need
> to shuffle around packages and services and config files. The slowest part
> for any
> decent sized database will be doing an analyze after bringing it up under
> 9.2,
> though. So however long that takes for your db, plus maybe 10-15 minutes or
> so, if you've practiced.
>
Yikes! Analyze will certainly take the longest time - we'll have to build
some kind of strategy for which tables to analyze first and how many to
analyze at once.
Thanks for letting me know.
Nik
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Scott Marlowe | 2012-10-23 14:41:01 | Re: 9.1 to 9.2 requires a dump/reload? |
Previous Message | Papiernik Anna-AAP053 | 2012-10-23 10:34:51 | oracle_fdw with oracle os authentication |