Re: 9.1 to 9.2 requires a dump/reload?

From: Nikolas Everett <nik9000(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alan Hodgson <ahodgson(at)simkin(dot)ca>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 9.1 to 9.2 requires a dump/reload?
Date: 2012-10-23 13:41:20
Message-ID: CAPmjWd1TQw9PNSUVj3+K64es-wDc=R+0Rvsr-cBmb13OhZHU6w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 6:17 PM, Alan Hodgson <ahodgson(at)simkin(dot)ca> wrote:

> On Monday, October 22, 2012 05:55:07 PM Nikolas Everett wrote:
> > I see that pg_upgrade is an option. Having never used how long should I
> > expect pg_upgrade to take? Obviously we'll measure it in our
> environment,
> > but it'd be nice to have a ballpark figure.
>
> pg_upgrade using hard links should only take a minute or 2. You'll also
> need
> to shuffle around packages and services and config files. The slowest part
> for any
> decent sized database will be doing an analyze after bringing it up under
> 9.2,
> though. So however long that takes for your db, plus maybe 10-15 minutes or
> so, if you've practiced.
>

Yikes! Analyze will certainly take the longest time - we'll have to build
some kind of strategy for which tables to analyze first and how many to
analyze at once.

Thanks for letting me know.

Nik

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Scott Marlowe 2012-10-23 14:41:01 Re: 9.1 to 9.2 requires a dump/reload?
Previous Message Papiernik Anna-AAP053 2012-10-23 10:34:51 oracle_fdw with oracle os authentication