Re: Fast COPY FROM based on batch insert

From: Etsuro Fujita <etsuro(dot)fujita(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Andrey Lepikhov <a(dot)lepikhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, "tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Zhihong Yu <zyu(at)yugabyte(dot)com>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, "tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Fast COPY FROM based on batch insert
Date: 2022-03-22 02:36:00
Message-ID: CAPmGK17p8B_7ZG8S7Nnod1JTbYFGmRixpSepjoMfNyArR0yL6Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 8:58 AM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
>
> On 2021-06-07 16:16:58 +0500, Andrey Lepikhov wrote:
> > Second version of the patch fixes problems detected by the FDW regression
> > tests and shows differences of error reports in tuple-by-tuple and batched
> > COPY approaches.
>
> Patch doesn't apply and likely hasn't for a while...

Actually, it has bit-rotted due to the recent fix for cross-partition
updates (i.e., commit ba9a7e392).

Thanks!

Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2022-03-22 02:47:13 Broken make dependency somewhere near win32ver.o?
Previous Message Kyotaro Horiguchi 2022-03-22 02:34:46 Re: Make mesage at end-of-recovery less scary.