From: | Etsuro Fujita <etsuro(dot)fujita(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | postgres_fdw: oddity in costing presorted foreign scans with local stats |
Date: | 2019-05-17 11:31:36 |
Message-ID: | CAPmGK17jaJLPDEkgnP2VmkOg=5wT8YQ1CqssU8JRpZ_NSE+dqQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
I noticed that there is (another) oddity in commit aa09cd242f: in the
!fpinfo->use_remote_estimate mode, when first called for costing an
unsorted foreign scan, estimate_path_cost_size() computes
retrieved_rows, which is the estimated number of rows fetched from the
remote server, by these:
retrieved_rows = clamp_row_est(rows / fpinfo->local_conds_sel)
retrieved_rows = Min(retrieved_rows, foreignrel->tuples);
where rows is the estimated number of output rows emitted from the
foreign scan, fpinfo->local_conds_sel is the selectivity of local
conditions, and foreignrel->tuples is the foreign table's reltuples.
This is good, BUT when next called for costing the presorted foreign
scan, that function re-computes retrieved_rows by the former, but
doesn't clamp it by the latter, which would produce wrong results.
Here is such an example:
create table t (a int, b int);
create foreign table ft (a int, b int) server loopback options
(table_name 't');insert into ft values (1, 10);
insert into ft values (2, 20);
analyze ft;
create function postgres_fdw_abs(int) returns int as $$ begin return
abs($1); end $$ language plpgsql immutable;
explain verbose select * from ft where postgres_fdw_abs(b) > 10 order by a;
QUERY PLAN
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Foreign Scan on public.ft (cost=100.00..101.89 rows=1 width=8)
Output: a, b
Filter: (postgres_fdw_abs(ft.b) > 10)
Remote SQL: SELECT a, b FROM public.t ORDER BY a ASC NULLS LAST
(4 rows)
For this query, we have rows=1 and foreignrel->tuples=2.
postgres_fdw_abs(b) > 10 is a local condition, for which we have
fpinfo->local_conds_sel=0.333333 (I got this by printf debugging). So
when first called for costing an unsorted foreign scan, by the former
equation retrieved_rows=3, then by the latter retrieved_rows=2, which
is correct. BUT when next called for costing the presorted foreign
scan, we have retrieved_rows=3, as that function doesn't clamp the
retrieved_rows. This is wrong, leading to incorrect cost estimates.
(This is an issue for the foreign-scan case, but I think we would have
the same issue for the foreign-join case.)
To fix, I propose to handle retrieved_rows in the same way as cached
costs; 1) cache retrieved_rows computed in the first call of
estimate_path_cost_size() into the foreign table's fpinfo, and 2) use
it after the first call. Also, I'd like to propose to put this code
in that function for !use_remote_estimate mode in each of the below
code for the cases of foreign scan, foreign join, and foreign grouping
as needed, and use the rows/width estimates stored in the fpinfo (ie,
fpinfo->rows and fpinfo->width) after the first call, like the
attached.
/*
* Use rows/width estimates made by set_baserel_size_estimates() for
* base foreign relations and set_joinrel_size_estimates() for join
* between foreign relations.
*/
rows = foreignrel->rows;
width = foreignrel->reltarget->width;
I think that that would make the code more consistent and easier to
understand. Also, there is another two reasons: a) this code seems
confusing to me for the foreign-grouping case, as the core code
doesn't set foreignrel->rows at all for grouped relations. The change
proposed above would avoid that confusion. And b) we can remove a
change made by commit ffab494a4d, which added support for sorting
grouped relations remotely in postgres_fdw. In that commit, to extend
the logic for re-using cached costs to the foreign-grouping case, I
modified add_foreign_grouping_paths() so that it saves the rows
estimate for a grouped relation made by estimate_path_cost_size() into
the grouped relation's foreignrel->rows. But for grouped relations,
we already save the row/width estimates into fpinfo->rows and
fpinfo->width, so the change proposed above would make that change
unnecessary.
Other change is: I noticed that commit 7012b132d0 incorrectly re-sets
the width estimates for grouped relations in the
!fpinfo->use_remote_estimate mode, so I fixed that as well in the
attached.
Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
fix-estimate_path_cost_size.patch | application/octet-stream | 8.9 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Juan José Santamaría Flecha | 2019-05-17 11:39:16 | Re: [Doc] pg_restore documentation didn't explain how to use connection string |
Previous Message | Andrey Borodin | 2019-05-17 10:59:58 | Re: pglz performance |