From: | Etsuro Fujita <etsuro(dot)fujita(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | dacherny(at)gmail(dot)com, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com |
Subject: | Re: BUG #16631: postgres_fdw tries to insert into generated columns |
Date: | 2021-07-07 07:20:45 |
Message-ID: | CAPmGK173z88dS-us68jm-3ynscYdSK=mnUpiO3pOTBP_5S=AFQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Sat, Jul 3, 2021 at 7:44 PM Etsuro Fujita <etsuro(dot)fujita(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> But rather
> than computing the generated columns locally, I’m wondering that we
> should compute them remotely, assuming that the corresponding
> generated columns are defined on the remote sides. (It would be the
> user’s responsibility to ensure that.) This seems to me similar to
> the constraint case, and if we did so, I think we could fix the
> reported issue by extending postgresImportForeignSchema to support
> generated columns.
I updated the patch as such:
* Modified nodeModifyTable.c and copyfrom.c so that they don't compute
generated columns for FDWs anymore.
* Modified deparse functions such as deparseInsertSql() so that the
query is deparsed to set target generated columns (if any) to DEFAULT.
* Added an option import_generated to postgres_fdw to support
importing generated columns.
* Added a bit more test cases to postgres_fdw.sql.
* Updated docs.
Currently, foreign tables are not allowed to be updated directly when
they have stored generated columns, but I think they could be. But I
left that as future work as that would be an improvement rather than a
fix.
Attached is an updated version of the patch.
Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
reconsider-handling-generated-columns-in-foreign-tables.patch | application/octet-stream | 25.5 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Adrian Ho | 2021-07-07 07:54:59 | Re: BUG #17083: [PATCH] PostgreSQL fails to build with OpenLDAP 2.5.x |
Previous Message | PG Bug reporting form | 2021-07-07 07:11:45 | BUG #17089: "ERROR: invalid memory alloc request size ..." occurs when updating a fixed number of records |