From: | Etsuro Fujita <etsuro(dot)fujita(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Gilles Darold <gilles(at)darold(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH][DOC] Fix for PREPARE TRANSACTION doc and postgres_fdw message. |
Date: | 2019-11-07 09:40:36 |
Message-ID: | CAPmGK1720grNvEhin_pG3CTM39a6HvR89cTXuAnT9s0rKHfQQA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Horiguchi-san,
On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 5:28 PM Kyotaro Horiguchi
<horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> At Thu, 7 Nov 2019 17:20:07 +0900, Etsuro Fujita <etsuro(dot)fujita(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote in
> > Only two people complaining about the wording? Considering as well
> > that we use that wording in the docs and there were no complains about
> > that IIRC, I don't feel a need to change that, TBH.
> But the most
> significant point in the previous mail is using "foreign tables using
> postgres_fdw" instead of "postgres_fdw foreign tables".
OK, but as I said above, I don't feel the need to change that. How
about leaving it for another patch to improve the wording in that
message and/or the documentation if we really need to do it.
> And the other
> point is using different message from temporary tables.
You mean we should do s/prepare/PREPARE/?
Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Sergei Fedorov | 2019-11-07 09:43:23 | Re: [Patch proposal] libpq portal support |
Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2019-11-07 09:40:19 | Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables |