Re: Comment in portal.h

From: Etsuro Fujita <etsuro(dot)fujita(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andy Fan <zhihuifan1213(at)163(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Comment in portal.h
Date: 2024-08-01 09:05:47
Message-ID: CAPmGK1629_03401siY5_tbC_h_HiZmx+EGg3nFzdxyE76iRpKg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On Wed, Jul 31, 2024 at 8:55 AM Andy Fan <zhihuifan1213(at)163(dot)com> wrote:
> Etsuro Fujita <etsuro(dot)fujita(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > I noticed $SUBJECT while working on something else:
> >
> > /*
> > * Where we store tuples for a held cursor or a PORTAL_ONE_RETURNING or
> > * PORTAL_UTIL_SELECT query. (A cursor held past the end of its
> > * transaction no longer has any active executor state.)
> > */
> > Tuplestorestate *holdStore; /* store for holdable cursors */
> > MemoryContext holdContext; /* memory containing holdStore */
> >
> > We do that for PORTAL_ONE_MOD_WITH as well, so the comment should be
> > "Where we store tuples for a held cursor or a PORTAL_ONE_RETURNING,
> > PORTAL_ONE_MOD_WITH, or PORTAL_UTIL_SELECT query.". Attached is a
> > patch for that.
>
> Patch looks good to me.
>
> All the codes of PortalRun & FillPortalStore & PortalRunSelect are
> consistent with this idea.

Pushed. Thanks for looking!

Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michail Nikolaev 2024-08-01 09:25:36 Re: [BUG?] check_exclusion_or_unique_constraint false negative
Previous Message Alexander Lakhin 2024-08-01 09:00:00 Re: Improving tracking/processing of buildfarm test failures