From: | Etsuro Fujita <etsuro(dot)fujita(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: BUG #17355: Server crashes on ExecReScanForeignScan in postgres_fdw when accessing foreign partition |
Date: | 2022-01-18 08:01:27 |
Message-ID: | CAPmGK16=dfQEJKthRHOXcP5QbzCP8T_fiJng6xdBrxeWSDwcYA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Fri, Jan 7, 2022 at 3:19 PM Etsuro Fujita <etsuro(dot)fujita(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 6, 2022 at 9:00 PM Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > 06.01.2022 12:56, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
> > > I haven't tried to reproduce this yet
I think a simple reproducer for this issue is:
1) Define the partitioned table async_pt as shown by Alexander.
2) Run concurrent transactions as follows.
Session A: insert into async_pt values (3000);
Session A: begin;
Session A: update async_pt set a = a;
Session B: delete from async_pt;
Session A: commit;
The commit in Session A would cause a server crash in Session B due to
the segmentation fault.
Also, I think a simple reproducer for the “cannot re-evaluate a
Foreign Update or Delete during EvalPlanQual” error is:
1) Define the partitioned table async_pt as shown by Alexander.
2) Run concurrent transactions as follows.
Session A: insert into async_pt values (3000);
Session A: begin;
Session A: update async_pt set a = a;
Session B: update async_pt set a = a;
Session A: commit;
The commit in Session A would cause the transaction in Session B to
abort with that error.
I think the root cause of these issues is that because of the rework
for inherited UPDATE/DELETE in commit 86dc90056, ForeignScan nodes
doing direct modifications are re-evaluated as part of the
EvalPlanQual subtree when doing an EvalPlanQual check, which breaks
the assumption that those ForeignScan nodes should never be
re-evaluated by EvalPlanQual, leading to these issues. To fix, I’d
like to propose to ignore those ForeignScan nodes in
ExecForeignScan/ExecReScanForeignScan when doing that recheck, like
the attached.
Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
fix-EPQ-handling-for-direct-modifications.patch | application/octet-stream | 2.0 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | PG Bug reporting form | 2022-01-18 09:31:25 | BUG #17369: tmp files didn't deleted after oom killer killed process |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2022-01-16 21:00:44 | Re: BUG #17363: 14 regression: "could not identify a hash function for type record" in a nested record in sublink |