Re: Cross-version Compatibility of postgres_fdw

From: Etsuro Fujita <etsuro(dot)fujita(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Cross-version Compatibility of postgres_fdw
Date: 2024-08-13 18:35:33
Message-ID: CAPmGK15LdtLk_QYoV6Catr35HdY3qRLdReLZrdp2U2Fak=pE2w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 12:49 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> This discussion tickles a concern I've had for awhile: do we really
> know that modern postgres_fdw would work with an 8.3 server (never
> mind 8.1)? How many of us are in a position to test or debug such
> a setup? The discussions we've had around old-version compatibility
> for pg_dump and psql seem just as relevant here.
>
> In short, I'm wondering if we should move up the goalposts and only
> claim compatibility back to 9.2.
>
> It'd be even better if we had some routine testing to verify that
> such cases work. I'm not volunteering to make that happen, though.

+1 to both. Unfortunately, I do not think I will have time for that, though.

Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2024-08-13 18:39:10 Re: btree: implement dynamic prefix truncation (was: Improving btree performance through specializing by key shape, take 2)
Previous Message Robert Haas 2024-08-13 18:29:52 Re: Add LSN <-> time conversion functionality