On Sun, Jan 9, 2022 at 4:00 AM Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> 08.01.2022 11:57, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
> > Ok, but I modified the added test case a bit further so that foreign
> > tables are well-defined like in your second test case, which I think
> > is good. Attached is an updated version of the patch.
> Thank you! The updated version looks even better to me.
Thanks for reviewing! I've committed the patch.
Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita