Re: Test case for parameterized remote path in postgres_fdw

From: Etsuro Fujita <etsuro(dot)fujita(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Test case for parameterized remote path in postgres_fdw
Date: 2023-08-16 09:45:06
Message-ID: CAPmGK14MPvuunHVTM4O69XmAoWBqP+1DNvQsdMmVSGm8CpswJQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Richard,

On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 9:41 AM Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 7:50 PM Etsuro Fujita <etsuro(dot)fujita(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> So we should have modified the second one as well? Attached is a
>> small patch for that.

> Agreed, nice catch! +1 to the patch.

Thanks for looking!

Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2023-08-16 10:01:01 Re: pg_logical_emit_message() misses a XLogFlush()
Previous Message Etsuro Fujita 2023-08-16 09:22:31 Re: postgres_fdw: wrong results with self join + enable_nestloop off