From: | John W Higgins <wishdev(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "pgsql-generallists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Could postgres12 support millions of sequences? (like 10 million) |
Date: | 2020-03-21 04:04:12 |
Message-ID: | CAPhAwGyWr2eGMzpafGrWr9ChFRyZ91Esz_tE7tE1HMnNCRxm9Q@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 8:13 PM pabloa98 <pabloa98(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> I hope I described the problem completely.
>
>
1) What is a group - does it exist prior to records being inserted? How
many groups are you working with? How long do they live for?
2) #1 but for element
3) How many records per second per group per element are you anticipating?
Are their spikes?
4) How long does a group/element live for? You can put 10 record per second
over 3 years and still be under 100 million records (the size of your
seq_number)
5) How quickly do you need the seq_number - if you batch created them once
a minute would that work? Does it need to be quicker than that? Slower than
that? Or is it an immediate need?
That's a starting point.....
John W Higgins
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Adrian Klaver | 2020-03-21 16:47:17 | Re: Could postgres12 support millions of sequences? (like 10 million) |
Previous Message | David G. Johnston | 2020-03-21 03:29:09 | Re: Could postgres12 support millions of sequences? (like 10 million) |