Re: Date created for tables

From: Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabrizio(at)timbira(dot)com(dot)br>
To: Ron <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-generallists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Date created for tables
Date: 2019-12-24 14:53:44
Message-ID: CAPfkCSCt0Q34PT8zo0OsEG-v__oFFoCg9GMnGL91O7f5aGK1NA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Em seg., 23 de dez. de 2019 às 23:14, Ron <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com>
escreveu:
>
> You all are grossly over-complicating this.
>

Maybe we are really very conservative, but everyone needs to
understand that every single piece of code added to core is our
responsibility to maintain and make sure don't break the whole thing.

I know it is a desired feature but on the other hand we put a lot of effort
to make PostgreSQL very extensible, so IMHO why don't put effort to create
an extension to implement this feature instead of trying repeatedly to get
it into the core without any success.

Using EventTriggers is very easy to get a very first version tracking local
objects and if we need to add shared objects (databases, roles,
tablespaces) we can use hooks and some piece of C code to do the job.

Regards,

--
Fabrízio de Royes Mello Timbira - http://www.timbira.com.br/
PostgreSQL: Consultoria, Desenvolvimento, Suporte 24x7 e Treinamento

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Adrian Klaver 2019-12-24 16:39:42 Re: Date created for tables
Previous Message Scott Ribe 2019-12-24 14:22:14 Re: logical replication protocol