From: | Christian Convey <christian(dot)convey(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Nico Williams <nico(at)cryptonector(dot)com> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Subject: | Re: Tackling JsonPath support |
Date: | 2016-12-03 02:04:24 |
Message-ID: | CAPfS4ZycJ52VJ+Q4Tidzz0zxDfQi4zOg4RgV8zTWpM2ng9CpXA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 1:32 PM, Nico Williams <nico(at)cryptonector(dot)com> wrote:
...
On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 08:53:33AM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 11:50 AM, Christian Convey
> > <christian(dot)convey(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > > I think I can satisfy (3) with a PG extension which provides a
> function that
> > > approximately implements JSONPath. My short-term plans are to submit
> such a
> > > patch.
> >
> > FWIW, I think that's a fine plan. I don't really know whether
> > JSONPath is the right standard to pick for the task of extracting bits
>
> It's not even a standard. Are there particular proposals that the ANSI
> SQL working group is considering?
>
Hi Nico, it seems to be something in the works with the standards
committee. We were discussing it earlier in the thread: [1]
Kind regards,
Christian
[1] http://www.mail-archive.com/pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org/msg297732.html
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2016-12-03 02:15:01 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add max_parallel_workers GUC. |
Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2016-12-03 01:28:01 | Re: [sqlsmith] Failed assertion in _hash_splitbucket_guts |