From: | Christian Convey <christian(dot)convey(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Question about Lockhart's book |
Date: | 2013-12-27 16:14:17 |
Message-ID: | CAPfS4ZyRAUgS8C21AQSLDhCjAu+oDNAHDwJKphZXsS64ZJcvgA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Andrew,
Thanks for your response. Sometimes overall software architectures stay
(mostly) unchanged for a long time, and so I figured that's possibly the
case for Postgresql as well. But I didn't know, which is why I asked.
Kind regards,
Christian
On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>wrote:
>
> On 12/27/2013 10:55 AM, Christian Convey wrote:
>
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> I'm starting to poke around the internals of Postgres. Does anyone know
>> the extent to which Thomas Lockhart's book, "PostgresSQL Programmer's
>> Guide" is accurate with respect to the current state of the code base?
>>
>>
>>
> Umm, that book was published in 2000, from what I can see on Amazon. Would
> you use a book published 13 years ago to educate yourself on, say, the
> Linux code base? 13 years is an eternity in this business.
>
> cheers
>
> andrew
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stefan Kaltenbrunner | 2013-12-27 16:43:13 | Re: Happy new year from viva64 |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2013-12-27 16:11:44 | Re: Question about Lockhart's book |